next up previous contents
Next: IP97 versus RS91 Up: Performance Evaluation Previous: Merits of Performance

   
Comparison of Tracking Errors

Only IP97 can handle all events: occlusions, entries and extis. The other four algorithms have different sets of admissible events. The intersection of these sets is empty. (See table 1.) In our tests, each algorithm is compared, under its own conditions, to IP97.

Two essentially different data sets are used in the evaluation. The sequences synthesized for SJ87 and RS91 contain no motion across image border, while the sequences generated for HW89, SS90 and IP97 contain border crossings. (For HW89, entry is only allowed.) It is important to emphasize that the results for these two data sets should not be compared directly. The reason is that the same number of trajectories in the two data sets does not mean the same average point density: when the points are allowed to exit and enter, many trajectories are short. When no motion across border is allowed, a generated trajectory is only accepted if it extends through the whole sequence, with a few possible occlusions. This higher average point density leads to more frequent groupings and ambiguities. The difference in density for the same $T$ grows with the mean speed.



 
next up previous contents
Next: IP97 versus RS91 Up: Performance Evaluation Previous: Merits of Performance
Dmitry Chetverikov
1998-11-24