Thus far, our queries have only accessed one table at a
time. Queries can access multiple tables at once, or access the
same table in such a way that multiple rows of the table are
being processed at the same time. A query that accesses multiple
rows of the same or different tables at one time is called a
join query. As an example, say you wish to list all the
weather records together with the location of the associated
city. To do that, we need to compare the city column of each row
of the weather table with the name column of all rows in the
cities table, and select the pairs of rows where these values
match.
Note:This is only a
conceptual model. The actual join may be performed in a more
efficient manner, but this is invisible to the user.
This would
be accomplished by the following query:
SELECT *
FROM weather, cities
WHERE city = name;
city | temp_lo | temp_hi | prcp | date | name | location
---------------+---------+---------+------+------------+---------------+------------
London | -5 | 25 | 0.3 | 2004-01-05 | London | (153,65.3)
San Francisco | 46 | 50 | 0.25 | 1994-11-27 | San Francisco | (-194,53)
San Francisco | 43 | 57 | 0 | 1994-11-29 | San Francisco | (-194,53)
(3 rows)
Observe two
things about the result set:
- There is no result row for the city of Hayward. This is because there is no
matching entry in the cities table for Hayward, so
the join ignores the unmatched rows in the weather
table. We will see shortly how this can be fixed.
- There are two columns containing the city
name. This is correct because the lists of columns of the
weather and the cities table are
concatenated. In practice this is undesirable, though, so
you will probably want to list the output columns
explicitly rather than using *:
SELECT city, temp_lo, temp_hi, prcp, date, location
FROM weather, cities
WHERE city = name;
Exercise: Attempt to find out the semantics
of this query when the WHERE clause is omitted.
Since the columns all had different names, the parser
automatically found out which table they belong to, but it is
good style to fully qualify column names in join queries:
SELECT weather.city, weather.temp_lo, weather.temp_hi,
weather.prcp, weather.date, cities.location
FROM weather, cities
WHERE cities.name = weather.city;
Join queries of the kind seen thus far can also be written in
this alternative form:
SELECT *
FROM weather INNER JOIN cities ON (weather.city = cities.name);
This syntax is not as commonly used as the one above, but we
show it here to help you understand the following
topics.
Now we will figure out how we can get the Hayward records
back in. What we want the query to do is to scan the
weather table and for each row to find the matching
cities row. If no matching row is found we want some
"empty values" to be substituted for the cities table's
columns. This kind of query is called an outer join. (The
joins we have seen so far are inner joins.) The command looks
like this:
SELECT * FROM weather LEFT OUTER JOIN cities ON (weather.city = cities.name);
city | temp_lo | temp_hi | prcp | date | name | location
---------------+---------+---------+------+------------+---------------+------------
Chicago | 15 | 35 | 0.1 | 2003-05-06 | |
Hayward | 37 | 54 | | 1994-11-29 | |
Hayward | 37 | 54 | | 1994-11-29 | |
London | -5 | 25 | 0.3 | 2004-01-05 | London | (153,65.3)
San Francisco | 46 | 50 | 0.25 | 1994-11-27 | San Francisco | (-194,53)
San Francisco | 43 | 57 | 0 | 1994-11-29 | San Francisco | (-194,53)
(6 rows)
This query is called a left outer join because the
table mentioned on the left of the join operator will have each
of its rows in the output at least once, whereas the table on
the right will only have those rows output that match some row
of the left table. When outputting a left-table row for which
there is no right-table match, empty (null) values are
substituted for the right-table columns.
Exercise: There are also
right outer joins and full outer joins. Try to find
out what those do.
We can also join a table against itself. This is called a
self join. As an example, suppose we wish to find all the
weather records that are in the temperature range of other
weather records. So we need to compare the temp_lo and
temp_hi columns of each weather row to the
temp_lo and temp_hi columns of all other
weather rows. We can do this with the following query:
SELECT W1.city, W1.temp_lo AS low, W1.temp_hi AS high,
W2.city, W2.temp_lo AS low, W2.temp_hi AS high
FROM weather W1, weather W2
WHERE W1.temp_lo < W2.temp_lo
AND W1.temp_hi > W2.temp_hi;
city | low | high | city | low | high
---------------+-----+------+---------------+-----+------
Hayward | 37 | 54 | San Francisco | 46 | 50
San Francisco | 43 | 57 | San Francisco | 46 | 50
Hayward | 37 | 54 | San Francisco | 46 | 50
(3 rows)
Here we have relabeled the weather table as W1 and
W2 to be able to distinguish the left and right side of
the join. You can also use these kinds of aliases in other
queries to save some typing, e.g.:
SELECT *
FROM weather w, cities c
WHERE w.city = c.name;
You will encounter this style of abbreviating quite frequently.
|